About Me

Name: James Pruitt
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Principles of Social Conservatism

The principles of social conservatism are much deeper than the three usually given by critics.  In fact – abortion, marriage, and creationism – are not principles at all but rather the natural outworking of much deeper principles.  Here are a few of the deeper principles. Please tell me with which you disagree.

1. The sanctity of human life. All individuals have value and should be treated accordingly.  Therefore, social conservatives oppose policies that cheapen human life – i.e. abortion, euthanasia, assisted suicide, health care death panels, health care rationing, tyrannical unlimited government, etc.

2. The sanctity of marriage and the family.  Marriage is the building block of western civilization and the foundation of any functional society.  Marriage should not be entered into lightly, nor should it be discarded on a mere whim.  The family is the next building block of society as it provides for the nurturing and instruction of the next generation.  Therefore, social conservatives oppose policies that lead to the destruction of marriage and the family – no fault divorce, welfare, absentee fathers, spousal abuse, government run daycare, public education coerced by the federal government and removed from local control, the glorification of self-indulgence, etc.

3. Freedom of religion and the separation of church and state.  The separation of church and state is a Biblical principle practiced in both the Old and New Testament.  The problem is that liberals and some libertarians do not want a separation of church and state.  They want a separation of the state from God.  They want the state to disregard all moral mandates from God and to not acknowledge His headship over the state.  In so doing, liberals and likeminded libertarians actually elevated the state as the highest authority and makes the state unanswerable to a higher power.  The Founding Fathers, even Jefferson, would not accept such a premise.

4. Support for the classical virtues and moral character – honesty, hardwork, diligence, thrift, self-control, self-disciplined, peaceful, self-reliant, and countless others.  Therefore, social conservatives oppose policies and actions that undermine these virtues and contribued to the undermining of individual moral character.  Social conservatives do not claim to be perfect in these virtues but everyone should strive for perfection.  I would also note that these virtues will lead to the fiscal restraint you fiscal conservatives want.  However, you can not expect to get the fruit without first plantng the seeds and watering the plant.

Although I will stop there, you can plainly see that that social conservatives encompasses much more than what you think. I would also point out that these are not necessarily religious issues but are moral and ethical principles essential to western civilization.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Social Conservatives and the Future of the GOP

In a recent column on Big Hollywood by John Romano argued the following:
 
"I gave a speech in Las Vegas last weekend.  My main points focused around gay marriage and abortion.  I put forth that Republicans need to avoid both issues like the plague.  Democrats consistently use them to paint urban Republicans into a corner of intolerance and “hate.”  Security, taxes, and avoiding Socialism are where we need to fight.  Don’t change your opinions, just focus on what is before the country today, I said.  I’d rather live in a country that was free and permitted both abortion and gay marriage than a Cap and Trade, government health care, Obama Motors, union controlled, weak military, nightmare of Socialism and Chicago patronage any day.  That’s just me.  I don’t have an in at City Hall.  I have to work for what I get."
 
The following is my response.
 
Your assertion that Republicans should avoid social conservative issues - abortion and gay marriage - "like the plague" is dead wrong, both politically and morally. 

Politically, public opinion now favors the social conservative position on these issues. More than 50% of Americans favor the pro-life position and over 80% favor protecting traditional marriage. Just because the main stream media and the Democrats attempt to use these positions against Republican candidates is no reason to go silent on the issue. Instead, Republican candidates should be taught how to respond to these media interrogations by presenting not only the moral argument for these positions but the conservative and constitutional argument as well.

In addition, the social conservative position on abortion and gay marriage is just the bridge we need to reach out to African Americans and Hispanics. African Americans provided the votes to pass Prop 8 in California and they consistently disagree with their party and Mr. Obama on the issue. Hispanics are overwhelmingly Catholic and pro-life. Here are two issues that will gain us traction with traditional Democratic voting blocs. Why would we want to go silent on the very issues that may win us the minority votes everyone claims to want?

Morally, it is reprehensible to ignore the murder of unborn children for political expediency. Social conservatives have consistently pushed the GOP to victory since Nixon and we have received little in return. Abortion is still legal and gay marriage is now on the liberal wish list. How long will conservatives stay apart of the GOP when it fails to honor their wishes? Where will they go you might ask? They may just drop out all together rather than support or simply turn a blind eye to evil. After all, what is a higher utility bill compared to the life of a child? 

I also think you commit a grave error when you separate the economic and security issues from social conservative issues. A government that can kill the unwanted and redefine the oldest tradition known to man is a government that has no problem with cap and trade or socialism. What is taking over a car company compared to redefining social institutions and determining who lives and who dies?

 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »